Swimming Performance in Surf: The Influence of Experience

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis (H1) that surf swimming involves a quantifiable experience component. Sixty-five beach lifeguards with (n = 35) and without surf experience (n = 30) completed: a best effort 200-m swim in a 25-m pool, a calm and a surf sea; an anthropometric survey; maximum effort 30-s swim bench test; 50-m pool swim (25 m underwater). In both groups, time to swim 200 m was slower in calm seas than in the pool and slower in surf than in either calm seas or the pool (p < 0.05). Calm sea swim times of the two groups did not differ significantly, but the no experience group was, on average (Sp-pooled variance), 49 s (62) slower on the 200-m swim in the surf conditions (p < 0.05). A stepwise regression identified surf experience as a predictor of surf swim time (R² = 0.32, p < 0.01). It is concluded that there is a significant and quantifiable (18 %) experience factor in surf swimming. This limits the usefulness of pool swim times and other land-based tests as predictors of surf swimming performance. The hypothesis (H1) is accepted.

Key words

lifeguard - sea sate - experience - waves - pool

References

• 1 Chatard J C, Lavoie J M, Lacour J R. Swimming skill cannot be interpreted directly from the energy cost of swimming. MacLaren D, Reilly T, Lees A Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming Science IV. London; E & FN Spon 1992: 173-180
• 2 Costill D L, Kovaleski J, Porter D A, Kirwan J, Fielding R, King D S. Energy expenditure during front crawl swimming: predicting success in middle-distance events.  Int J Sports Med. 1985;  6 266-270
• 3 Durnin J V, Womersley J. Body fat assessment from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurement on 481 men and women aged from 16 – 72 years.  Br J Nutrition. 1974;  32 77-90
• 4 Gayton P H. The physique of New Zealand surf life savers.  NZ J Health Phys Ed Recr. 1975;  8 114-120
• 5 Gulbin J P, Fell J W, Gaffney P T. A physiological profile of elite surf ironmen, full time lifeguards and patrolling surf life savers.  Aus J Sci Med Sport. 1996;  28 86-90
• 6 Hawley J A, Williams M M. Relationship between upper body anaerobic power and freestyle swimming performance.  Int J Sports Med. 1991;  12 1-5
• 7 Kimura Y, Yeater R A, Martin R B. Simulated swimming: a useful tool for evaluation the V˙O_2max of swimmers in the laboratory.  Br J Sp Med. 1990;  24 201-206
• 8 Lavoie J M, Leone M, Bongbele J. Functional maximal aerobic power and prediction of swimming performances.  J Swimming Research. 1988;  4 17-19
• 9 Reilly T R, Wooler A, Tipton M J. Occupational fitness standards for beach lifeguards phase 1: the physiological demands of beach lifeguarding.  Occup Med. 2005;  56 6-11
• 10 Shvartz E, Reibold R C. Aerobic fitness norms for males and females aged 6 to 75 years: a review.  Aviat Space Environ Med. 1980;  61 3-11
• 11 Swaine I, Reilly T. The freely-chosen swimming stroke rate in a maximal swim and on a biokinetic swim bench.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;  15 370-376
• 12 Tanaka H, Costill D L, Thonas R, Fink W J, Widrick J J. Dry-land resistance training for competitive swimming.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;  25 952-959
• 13 Tipton M J, Reilly T R, Iggleden C, Rees A. Fitness and Medical Standards for Beach Lifeguards. Portsmouth; University of Portsmouth Report to the RNLI 2002
• 14 VanHeest J H, Mahoney C E, Herr L. Characteristics of elite open-water swimmers.  J Strength Cond Res. 2004;  18 302-305